What I Would Ask Jim Balsillie of RIM This Morning
Here are some questions for Jim Balsillie, after last night's cut earnings for Research in Motion.
Read my post on Forbes here.
Eric Jackson's Blog About Longs, Shorts, Hedge Funds, Corporate Governance, and China
Here are some questions for Jim Balsillie, after last night's cut earnings for Research in Motion.
Read my post on Forbes here.
Posted by Unknown at 10:58 AM View Comments
Labels: AAPL, Android, BlackBerry, GOOG, Google, iPhone, Jim Lazaridis, PlayBook, Research in Motion, RIM, RIMM
By Eric Jackson
RealMoney Contributor
4/28/2011 12:15 PM EDT
Click here for more stories by Eric Jackson
Last night's report from Baidu (BIDU - commentary - Trade Now) didn't disappoint the bulls. The company beat earnings expectations by $0.03 a share and beat top-line revenue estimates.
More important, Baidu raised its guidance for the second quarter above $500 million, on the high end of the range. This was beyond any prior high-end estimates for the second quarter. Quite simply, Baidu is continuing to perform with continued staggering growth.
The company's trailing 12 months of revenue prior to last night was $1 billion. Last night's quarter annualized is up to over $1.3 billion in revenue. Next quarter's guidance puts it up to $2 billion annualized. Its last quarter-on-quarter earnings growth compared with the prior year is 171%. That compares to the "mature" growth of Apple (AAPL - commentary - Trade Now) at 95% and Google (GOOG - commentary -Trade Now) of 20%.
But Baidu is still relatively small compared with Google. We're talking $1 billion or so in revenue a year vs. $30 billion. Can Baidu continue to justify a high multiple in the coming years? It now has almost one-third the market capitalization of Google.
To hear Robin Li, the founder and CEO of Baidu, talking about it on last night's call, Baidu still has a lot of growth areas ahead of it, including:
This morning, there are some increased price targets out from analysts. The stock is up.
Baidu is a solid Chinese company. It might not grow 143% in the next 12 months as it has in the last 12 months, but it will do very well.
At the time of publication, Jackson had long positions in BIDU, SINA, YHOO and AAPL.and short YOKU
Part III of an interview with Chrystia Freeland on The Rise of the New Global Elite and the rapid disappearance of the Middle Class in America.
Read the full post here at Forbes.
Posted by Unknown at 12:07 PM View Comments
Labels: America, China, Chrystia Freeland, Davos, Global Elites, Middle Class, World Economic Forum
Part II of an interview with Chrystia Freeland on The Rise of the New Global Elite and the rapid disappearance of the Middle Class in America.
Read the full post on Forbes here.
Posted by Unknown at 11:33 AM View Comments
Labels: America, China, Chrystia Freeland, Global Elites, Income Disparity, Middle Class
Part I of an interview with Chrystia Freeland on The Rise of the New Global Elite and the rapid disappearance of the Middle Class in America.
Read my full Forbes post here.
Posted by Unknown at 10:38 AM View Comments
Labels: America, China, Chrystia Freeland, Global Elites, Middle Class
It's time stop pretending the decline of the middle class isn't happening and propose solutions. It will take fair trade with China, embracing our own elites instead of castigating them, and a more (not less) directive government.
Read my full post at Forbes here.
Posted by Unknown at 2:02 PM View Comments
Labels: China, Chrystia Freeland, Dollar Policy, Global Elites, Joseph Steiglitz, Michael Moore, Middle Class, Paul Tudor Jones, Tax Policy, Yuan policy
By Eric Jackson, Senior Contributor04/27/11 - 08:00 AM EDT What happened? There was a time -- just before you IPO'ed in 2004 -- when we really thought Google(GOOG_) was a kooky company. You put that strange letter to shareholders in your S-1. You said you wouldn't pay attention to the short-term demands of Wall Street. You set up a dual-class share structure so that none of our activist hedge fund brothers could throw you out if you did a terrible job. You said you were going to be a different kind of company. We don't like different. It's hard to figure out. It's random. Worst of all, it suggests your margins are going to suck. Luckily, Eric Schmidt won us over. He was very articulate, if not a little professorial. He seemed to listen to our concerns and communicate back to us in a way that conveyed understanding and serious intent. In short, we liked him and our confidence was bolstered by your results since IPO. However, since you pushed Eric out so that you could retake the CEO title, we're a little freaked out. All those early fears of ours about a bunch of kids running this company in some haphazard way came back to us. The day you made the announcement that you were taking over for Eric, you released a picture of you, Sergey and Eric sticking your heads out of a Prius that drives itself around the Google parking lot. Driverless cars? That's in the Google R&D budget? More recently, we've read that you're investing in wind farms in Oregon. Hundreds of millions of dollars in wind farms. Your recent quarter's results showed operating expenses up 40% because you gave everybody one-time 10% pay hikes across the board. In short, we're seeing lots of spending and it's not at all clear how this is going to benefit us -- the shareholders. We know you call us Wall Street people and you look down on us. You think because we're not engineers or Rhodes Scholars that we're not as smart as you. You think we're slick guys in flashy suits who don't deserve what we're paid. You put us down in private -- until you need our money.
NEW YORK (TheStreet) --
Dear Larry:Google CEO Larry Page
.......
[** This post is an excerpt of the full article, which is available on TheStreet.com by clicking here. Free Site.**]
Sphere: Related ContentPosted by Unknown at 8:50 AM View Comments
Labels: Eric Schmidt, GOOG, Google, Larry Page, Open letter, Sergey Brin, Wall Street
95% earnings growth is apparently not enough to move Apple's stock price. Here is what will.
Read the full post here at Forbes.
Posted by Unknown at 10:53 AM View Comments
Labels: AAPL, Apple, China, DFS, Discover Financial, iPad, MA, Mastercard
My latest opinion piece from the WSJ China on why Chinese Internet stocks are still not in a bubble.
Read the whole post here.
Posted by Unknown at 8:53 AM View Comments
Labels: Baidu, Charles Chao, Chinese Internet, Chinese IPOs, Sina, Tencent, YOKU
By Eric Jackson Swisher is not someone who publishes for the sake of link-baiting. She takes her craft of journalism very seriously, and that is why she's the best at her beat. According to Swisher, the current potential suitors for Yahoo! are the same as the old ones: News Corp.(NWS - commentary - Trade Now), Microsoft (MSFT - commentary - Trade Now), AOL (AOL - commentary- Trade Now), Disney (DIS - commentary - Trade Now), Providence Equity Partners and even Morgan Stanley (MS - commentary - Trade Now). And another player, former News Corp. president Peter Chernin, is also reported to be interested in doing a deal. What a deal might look like and what roles these various partners might play are topics that are still being bandied about privately. The biggest open question from all the new information discussed in the post is, what will happen to Yahoo!'s stake in Alibaba Group? For example, if Providence and News Corp. and Microsoft all joined forces and bought Yahoo!'s core business, doesn't Alibaba (and Softbank for that matter) have a veto on this deal? This question came up at the time of the Microsoft bid, but to my knowledge it has never been answered. Presumably, Alibaba would love to buy back Yahoo!'s 40% stake in Alibaba at a cheap valuation. If Alibaba did offer to do so at a low-ball valuation -- and if Yahoo!'s board accepted -- it would be offensive to Yahoo! shareholders. As a Yahoo! shareholder, I have a hard time seeing how I'm better off with these assets under the care of News Corp., or Microsoft or Providence Equity or Peter Chernin. Are any of them going to pay me $60 for my shares? That's going to be a tough number to sell to any board. But Yahoo!'s shares are going to be worth that by 2015 -- by my estimates -- even if Yahoo! CEO Carol Bartz utterly fails to turn around the core business. That's simply from the expected growth of the private assets of Alibaba. ... [*** This post is an excerpt of the full article, available by clicking here to go to RealMoney.com. Note: subscription required. ***]
RealMoney Contributor
4/25/2011 1:00 PM EDT
Click here for more stories by Eric Jackson
Kara Swisher's Good Friday post in The Wall Street Journal about several potential acquirers taking another look at Yahoo! (YHOO - commentary - Trade Now) was very interesting in a number of respects, and it should reignite the shares, which have languished since last fall, which was when Yahoo! was most recently the subject of buyout chatter.
Posted by Unknown at 1:08 PM View Comments
Labels: Alibaba, AliPay, Carol Bartz, Jack Ma, Taobao.com, Yahoo, YHOO
Another Internet Bubble is not about to collapse. We have a few more years still. So party like it's 1996.
Read my full post at Forbes here.
Posted by Unknown at 11:49 AM View Comments
Labels: AAPL, Amazon, AMZN, Apple, BIDU, Cisco, CSCO, Fred Wilson, Groupon, Henry Blodget, TheGlobe.com
By Eric Jackson Taking a step back, here's what I thought were the most important details from the earnings release and conference call: ... [*** This post is an excerpt of the full article, available by clicking here to go to RealMoney.com. Note: subscription required. ***]
RealMoney Contributor
4/21/2011 11:30 AM EDT
Click here for more stories by Eric Jackson
It was another strong quarter from Apple (AAPL - commentary - Trade Now), which reported its results yesterday after the close.
The company beat on most of its numbers (as it usually does) and missed on some others. However, people seemed to pay little attention to the misses and gravitated toward the strengths of the quarter. This morning, there are already four upgrades out on the stock, which are helping to move the stock.
Posted by Unknown at 12:34 PM View Comments
Labels: AAPL, Apple, iPad, iPhone, Peter Oppenheimer, Steve Jobs, Tim Cook
Apple is using its lead in with the iPad to convert Android and BlackBerry users to the iOS platform. New data suggest this shift is happening faster than anyone predicted.
Read my full Forbes post here.
Posted by Unknown at 3:38 PM View Comments
Labels: AAPL, Android, Apple, BlackBerry, GOOG, Google, PlayBook, RIMM
Yahoo! shareholders are likelier to see a $30 stock price sooner if they vote "against" Carol Bartz' and Roy Bostock's re-election at this June's shareholder meeting.
Please read the full post at Forbes here.
Posted by Unknown at 2:51 PM View Comments
Labels: AKAM, Alibaba, BIDU, Carol Bartz, DANG, Jack Ma, Jerry Yang, Joe Tsai, Qihoo 360, QIHU, Roy Bostock, Sina, Yahoo, YHOO, YOKU
By Eric Jackson04/20/11 - 08:00 AM EDT We are now starting to see new Chinese companies rushing to list their stocks on the U.S. exchanges.Dangdang(DANG_) has managed to hold a price at a big premium to its December IPO. Qihoo 360(QIHU_) is another high-flying IPO from last month. RenRen(RENN), the "Facebook of China," is planning to list next month. The more these relatively smaller stocks go up, the more it seems that the bigger Chinese portal names keep going up. Look at Sina's performance in the last two weeks alone for evidence of that. China observer and investor Bill Bishop said on Tuesday that he thinks there is a revaluation going on in the Chinese Internet sector: Most U.S.-Listed Chinese Internet stocks are soaring, with some up 10%+ Monday, and some up 30% or more in a matter of weeks. Many of these firms, like Baidu and Sina, have great businesses and massive growth prospects, but the surge seems to be about more than just fundamentals. Are investors in relative valuation mode, believing that because immature firms like Youku (6.7B market cap), Qihoo (3.7B) and RenRen (planned IPO valuation is $4B+) are so richly valued, then Sina, Baidu, Sohu, Shanda et al are dramatically undervalued on a relative basis? There is logic to that argument, and it can sustain high valuations for a while, especially given the great wall of money that is both being reallocated to China by Western funds and is sitting in Chinese hands looking for speculative opportunities. I agree with his logic. I think this revaluation is going on. And I agree with him that this is not a bubble. It could grow into one -- but we have a long way to go. In "dot com" era terms, I would characterize the current Chinese tech sector as being in the equivalent of the fall of 1995. Netscape went public that year in August. As its price held up for the first few weeks after, it made people reconceptualize the value of tech.Yahoo!(YHOO_) went public in April 1996. And, after that, the race was on for tech billions. I think we still have another four years of growth ahead of us in the Chinese tech world. Buckle up: it's going to be a fun ride. But, here's a question for you: If there is a revaluation going on in the Chinese Internet world, it has so far eluded the biggest Chinese Web company in the world (at least, as I see the Chinese Web world playing out over the next five years). Tencent and Baidu may be the big dogs today with $50 billion market capitalization each. And they will likely triple in size over the next five years, as the wealth of Chinese people increases and Internet penetration doubles or triples from its current levels.
NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- China Internet stocks are on fire. The unstoppable SINA(SINA_) is now up 106% year-to-date. SOHU(SOHU_) is up 56%. Baidu(BIDU_) is up 53%. Even new IPO Youku (YOKU_) is up 94% year-to-date.
But it would not be for another 3.5 years after Yahoo!'s IPO that the "dot com" bubble burst.
.......
[** This post is an excerpt of the full article, which is available on TheStreet.com by clicking here. Free Site.**]
Sphere: Related ContentPosted by Unknown at 9:02 AM View Comments
Labels: Alibaba, AliPay, Baidu, Carol Bartz, DANG, Jack Ma, Taobao.com, Yahoo, Yahoo Japan, YHOO, Youku
My take on the upcoming RenRen ($RENN) IPO and why Americans love calling it the "Facebook of China" even though it's not.
Read the full opinion in WSJ China here.
Posted by Unknown at 12:48 PM View Comments
Labels: Chinese IPOs, Facebook, IPO, Mark Zuckerberg, RENN, Renren, WSJ China
I've owned SINA since November and talked about it since December. Here's why I liked it back then and still hold it.
Read my full post in Forbes.
By Eric Jackson That's pretty much all it takes these days. It's not unreasonable to expect its valuation to easily double or triple when it goes public, just as it did with Youku.com (YOKU - commentary - Trade Now) and Dangdang (DANG - commentary -Trade Now) in December, and Qihoo 360 (QIHU -commentary - Trade Now) last month. It will actually be interesting to see whether -- expecting another hot placement from investors -- the RenRen investment bankers will try to up the offer pricing to capture more value for the listing company, rather than pad the bank accounts of the investment banks' institutional clients. Remember how Dangdang's CEO got into a Twitter-style scuffle on Sina's(SINA - commentary - Trade Now) Weibo, supposedly with one of the Morgan Stanley bankers, after their IPO a few months ago? The CEO complained -- among other things -- that the bank hadn't priced the offering high enough to benefit the company's coffers. With Sina riding sky high these days and new private valuations for Facebook and Twitter seemingly every week, it's hard to see how RenRen doesn't have a great initial pop next week. The company booked $77 million in revenue last year with an operating profit of $8 million. Though it still had a net loss for the year, revenue grew 64% from the prior year. RenRen describes itself as the leading real-name social networking Internet platform in China, as measured by total page views and total user time spent on social networking websites. RenRen stated in its initial filing with the Securities and Commission that it had 117 million "activated" users at the end of March. It also said that, according to consulting firmiResearch, monthly total page views are 2.3 times higher than those of its closest competitor. [*** This post is an excerpt of the full article, available by clicking here to go to RealMoney.com. Note: subscription required. ***]
RealMoney Contributor
4/18/2011 1:40 PM EDT
Click here for more stories by Eric Jackson
If all goes as planned, RenRen, the "Facebook" of China, will go public in the U.S. in early May under the ticker "RENN." It hopes to raise nearly $600 million and be valued at over $11 billion.
On the surface, the company has all the makings of another mega-Chinese initial public offering. It has two of the more prestigious investment banks managing the IPO: Morgan Stanley (MS -commentary - Trade Now) and Credit Suisse (CS- commentary - Trade Now). And, most important, it is a Chinese company involved in the Internet.
Chinese gaming company Perfect World has had a disappointing last 12 months, but some new games are about to change its luck. Expect a $47 stock by the end of the year.
Read the whole post over at Forbes.
Posted by Unknown at 12:51 PM View Comments
Labels: Baidu, BIDU, CSCO, Ga, Giant Interactive, Kong, KongZhong, Perfect World, PWRD, Sina
Larry Page's first earnings call last night was a disaster. If you want to be CEO, you have to lead.
Read my full post on Forbes.
Posted by Unknown at 10:08 AM View Comments
Labels: Eric Schmidt, GOOG, Google, Jerry Yang, Larry Page, Patrick Pichette, Yahoo, YHOO
By Eric Jackson Kara Swisher of All Things Digital is right that the "core" business has an amazing brand with enviable traffic. It's not so much that I'm bearish on the chances of turning this around, it's just that I'm so super-bullish on Taobao and Alipay. As I've said here before, Yahoo! is trading at about half of where it should be today based on some research I've done into how well Alipay and Taobao are doing. Yet that value is not being reflected in the Yahoo! stock price because they remain private -- so no one truly knows how well they are doing. Yet it is undeniable that Taobao and Alipay are setting themselves up as a combination of the Amazon(AMZN - commentary - Trade Now), eBay (EBAY - commentary - Trade Now) and Paypal of China. And they're doing it at an even bigger scale than the American giants. Industry consultants estimate that Taobao has a 70%-85% market share of the e-commerce market in China. That's truly astounding. And, every quarter that goes by, we seem to get another moon-shot Chinese IPO. A couple of weeks ago it was Qihoo 360 (QIHU - commentary - Trade Now). Last quarter, it was Youku (YOKU - commentary - Trade Now) and Dangdang (DANG - commentary - Trade Now). All these Chinese IPOs are minuscule compared to Taobao. Dangdang, for example, is estimated by consultants to have only 3% of the Chinese e-commerce market. And remember that Chinese e-commerce is expected to grow 5x by 2015. Taobao will see its large size grow even larger in the next few years -- and Yahoo! shareholders will be along for the ride. So, what is the catalyst for people to recognize the value of Yahoo!? Obviously, an IPO of Taobao and/or Alipay would force transparency on their financials and force the market to reflect that value in Yahoo!'s shares. Yet, there is no sign of anything like that being imminent. [*** This post is an excerpt of the full article, available by clicking here to go to RealMoney.com. Note: subscription required. ***]
RealMoney Contributor
4/14/2011 1:45 PM EDT
Click here for more stories by Eric Jackson
Many investors have either totally forgotten about Yahoo! (YHOO - commentary - Trade Now) or think that the only play is to wait on a turnaround of its historical business.
I have a long position in Yahoo!, but it has nothing to do with its "core" business. Although I wish the company well, and it seems that Ross Levinsohn and Black Irving seem to be doing a better job overseeing that business than anyone else probably for the past decade, the potential for this business is dwarfed by the potential for Yahoo!'s 40% stakes in Taobao and Alipay.