Six Years Later, The Problem at HP is Still the Board
The HP board in 2012 is just as dysfunctional as it was in 2006. Here's a reflection of how bad they were back then.
Read the full Forbes post
Eric Jackson's Blog About Longs, Shorts, Hedge Funds, Corporate Governance, and China
The HP board in 2012 is just as dysfunctional as it was in 2006. Here's a reflection of how bad they were back then.
Read the full Forbes post
Posted by
Unknown
at
1:58 PM
View Comments
Labels: Board, HP, HPQ, John Hammergren, Larry Babbio, Leo Apotheker, Mark Hurd, Sari Baldauf
How can you be the Chairman of HP after the last 11 months and give yourself a promotion? Ray Lane must go now.
Read the full post in Forbes
Posted by
Unknown
at
10:19 AM
View Comments
Labels: HP, HPQ, Kleiner Perkins, Leo Apotheker, Meg Whitman, Oracle, ORCL, Ray Lane
Posted by
Unknown
at
9:08 AM
View Comments
Labels: Eric Jackson, HP, HPQ, Leo Apotheker, Meg Whitman, Ray Lane
This HP Board has screwed up so many times, it's a joke. They need to be completely dismantled.
Read the full Forbes post
Posted by
Unknown
at
3:19 PM
View Comments
Labels: HPQ, Leo Apotheker, Marc Andreessen, MCK, Meg Whitman, ORCL, Ray Lane, SAP, YHOO
HP (HPQ) is perhaps the biggest Dog of the Dow these days.
The stock is down 43% year-to-date and seems to be universally hated at the moment after announcing plans to spin off its PC division, shut down its WebOS efforts, and buy a billion-dollar-a-year business for $10 billion.
So, after investors threw in the towel last Friday, should you look to buy in for a dead cat bounce?
No. There's still just too much risk tied up in HP.
The stock is likely in the dog house for at least the next six months, much the same way that Google (GOOG) was earlier this year after the company announced that it was replacing Eric Schmidt with Larry Page.
In my view, you can expect a further slippage in the stock for the next three-to-four weeks, followed up by five months of relative flatness. Over that period, you'll likely hear of key executives leaving the firm (like Todd Bradley, who heads up their PC division called PSG), as well as some further rank-and-file job cuts. None of that is going to prop up the stock.
I think you're also likely to hear about some more billion-dollar acquisitions in the coming months. If the HP board has done nothing, it's shown that they are not afraid to keep doubling down on a strategy, even if the mainstream media disapproves.
What will be the catalysts for buying in to the stock again?
Look for a deal announced for the PC division. Some think this is going to take up to a year. I expect it will be sooner as the HP board is feeling the pressure to make something happen.
Look for a deal to sell the Palm group and its patents. I haven't seen anyone quote the raw number of patents received by Palm in the mobile space but the final price tag for these will likely be high. The price could be close to the Nortel (NT) bid price and that could wake up investors to HP's stock again.
Of course, overly strong earnings would help as well, but that's still likely over a year away.
The bottom line: look again at HP in January. Until then, consider it a falling knife.
At the time of publication, the author had no positions in any of the securities mentioned.
Shares in Hewlett-Packard immediately sold off on the news, and they are still down today. The key questions are why, and where are the shares going next?
Let's face it, most of the selloff was due to the market fretting: "It's really not Apple (AAPL -commentary - Trade Now) Tim Cook taking over!" That rumor was swirling early in the week, boosting Hewlett-Packard's shares while knocking down Apple's. The rumor was denied within a couple of hours, and why shouldn't it have been?
Put yourself in Tim Cook's shoes. You're next in line to lead what very well might soon be the biggest company in the world by market cap. Your boss, although seemingly healthy and just as vibrant as he has ever been, has recently suffered from a rare medical condition. Would you leave, just so you can become the CEO of Hewlett-Packard today? No chance.
Yet hope sprang eternal for investors. Even if Hewlett-Packard announced it was hiring Jack Welch to come out of retirement and lead it, the stock would have slumped, because it wasn't Cook.
That being said, there's no question that another big part of the selloff had to do with the fact that no one was expecting Leo Apotheker's name.
The most obvious choice was Executive Vice President Todd Bradley as an internal pick. Bradley has been successful in his role at Hewlett-Packard, turning around PCs, and he seemed to be the right age and tenure to step forward. EVP Ann Livermore had been passed over twice before. EVP David Donatelli was still too new to Hewlett to grab the brass ring.
....
Posted by
Unknown
at
10:14 PM
View Comments
Labels: Ann Livermore, Dave Donatelli, Hewlett-Packard, HP, Leo Apotheker, Todd Bradley