Showing posts with label Orient Paper. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Orient Paper. Show all posts

Saturday, August 28, 2010

Revisiting the Orient Paper Ordeal

By Eric Jackson
RealMoney Contributor

8/27/2010 7:47 AM EDT
Click here for more stories by Eric Jackson


There has been relatively little news out on Orient Paper (ONP - commentary - Trade Now) for the last month or so. This small China-based paper producer jumped into the spotlight at the end of June when a previously unheard-of research firm called Muddy Waters claimed the company had issued fraudulent financial releases. In the wake of the allegations, Orient Paper stock -- which previously had been trading 200,000 shares a day (and, on some days, far less) -- now experienced daily volume of more than 1 million shares.

Several investors with long positions spoke out in favor of the company, while others with short positions stood behind Muddy Waters' allegations. Orient Paper's stock has been unquestionably volatile since the ordeal began, and the action has ultimately brought the price sharply lower. Today, the stock trades in the mid-$4 range, compared with more than $8 earlier in June.

The stock is, of course, cheap on a number of metrics. The trailing price-to-earnings ratio comes to 4.3x, and the trailing enterprise value per earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization is at 3.9x. However, a cloud of potential impropriety continues to hang over the company. Muddy Waters' allegations were numerous, including the inflation of inventory numbers, issuance of false numbers and diversion of funds from two recent private placements. Like a number of others, I have countered these claims -- and, not surprisingly, the long investors tend to agree with these views, while the short investors do not.

Orient Paper has tried to respond aggressively to the accusations, as well, via press releases and other means. Of course, in its most noteworthy action, the company's board recently authorized law firm Loeb & Loeb to engage an outside Big Four auditor to conduct a full third-party audit of the company. Deloitte was subsequently hired as that auditor.

....

[*** This post is an excerpt of the full article, available by clicking here to go to RealMoney.com. Note: subscription required. ***]

Sphere: Related Content

Revisiting the Orient Paper Ordeal

By Eric Jackson
RealMoney Contributor

8/27/2010 7:47 AM EDT
Click here for more stories by Eric Jackson


There has been relatively little news out on Orient Paper (ONP - commentary - Trade Now) for the last month or so. This small China-based paper producer jumped into the spotlight at the end of June when a previously unheard-of research firm called Muddy Waters claimed the company had issued fraudulent financial releases. In the wake of the allegations, Orient Paper stock -- which previously had been trading 200,000 shares a day (and, on some days, far less) -- now experienced daily volume of more than 1 million shares.

Several investors with long positions spoke out in favor of the company, while others with short positions stood behind Muddy Waters' allegations. Orient Paper's stock has been unquestionably volatile since the ordeal began, and the action has ultimately brought the price sharply lower. Today, the stock trades in the mid-$4 range, compared with more than $8 earlier in June.

The stock is, of course, cheap on a number of metrics. The trailing price-to-earnings ratio comes to 4.3x, and the trailing enterprise value per earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization is at 3.9x. However, a cloud of potential impropriety continues to hang over the company. Muddy Waters' allegations were numerous, including the inflation of inventory numbers, issuance of false numbers and diversion of funds from two recent private placements. Like a number of others, I have countered these claims -- and, not surprisingly, the long investors tend to agree with these views, while the short investors do not.

Orient Paper has tried to respond aggressively to the accusations, as well, via press releases and other means. Of course, in its most noteworthy action, the company's board recently authorized law firm Loeb & Loeb to engage an outside Big Four auditor to conduct a full third-party audit of the company. Deloitte was subsequently hired as that auditor.

....

[*** This post is an excerpt of the full article, available by clicking here to go to RealMoney.com. Note: subscription required. ***]

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, July 23, 2010

ONP Is Doing All the Right Things

By Eric Jackson
RealMoney Contributor

7/23/2010 12:45 PM EDT
Click here for more stories by Eric Jackson

Over the past five days, Orient Paper's (ONP - commentary - Trade Now) stock price has dropped 31%. Over the past month, the stock price has plunged 51%. Obviously, this has generated a lot of pain for long holders of the stock, including me.

Research organization Muddy Waters has made many allegations against the company. Based on ONP's response and my research, I do not believe these allegations to be true. ONP published a detailed response to Muddy Waters' allegations on July 6. In that response, ONP answered questions on: (1) its use of the proceeds from two prior placements, (2) its reasoning for purchasing a new 360,000-ton corrugating paper line, (3) the consistency of its SEC and Chinese securities filings, (4) its top 10 customers, (5) its transportation logistics, (6) its inventory turnover and (7) its gross margins. If you haven't read the response, I would urge you to do so and judge for yourselves which side has a more convincing argument.

After its written response, ONP held a conference call with investors to discuss its rebuttal of Muddy Waters' allegations. I dialed in and asked a question of management. Neither Muddy Waters nor any other critic of the company called in.

Furthermore, since the company's detailed response on July 6, Muddy Waters has only made two additional comments. On July 13, Muddy Waters asserted that the new production line being built by Qinyang for ONP was vastly overpriced. This new assumption was based on a phone call allegedly conducted by Muddy Waters with a Mr. Zhang, who is the head of sales for Qinyang.

Muddy Waters had speculated in its original June 28 allegations that Qinyang might not be building a machine at all. It based this assumption on previous phone calls to Qinyang, in which it claimed to have spoken with someone there and discovered that most machines built by Qinyang cost less than the $27 million being paid by ONP.

....

[*** This post is an excerpt of the full article, available by clicking here to go to RealMoney.com. Note: subscription required. ***]

Sphere: Related Content

Guest Post: Another Perspective on ONP and Doing Business in China

I have been writing about Orient Paper (ONP) for the last few months. There have been a number of bullish and bearish articles written about the company.


Last night, I received the following article from Edward Hoots, who is an American now living in China working as a Shop Foreman at a plant. I don't know Edward and haven't done any due diligence on him or his background. He appears to be a long holder of ONP.

Although I don't necessarily agree with all his points below, I think they are a useful perspective on the ONP controversy and how cultural biases might play a part in some of the different points of view. If you have comments on the post below, I will pass them on to Edward:

… Alas, I have read the July 22nd article on the Muddy Waters website and I think I understand some of the confusion (not fraud) that their original report and ensuing turmoil has generated.

I have always felt that the Muddy Waters people were comparing operations and accounting procedures at ONP to western business practices.

Some of the allegations of fraud and shell companies may seem valid by western standards but are an essential if not required part of doing business in China.

Some of the other allegations, drawing from my memory are:

Fraudulent RTO

Dongfang Trading company

Overstating the cost of new equipment

Changing top 10 customers year to year.

High inventory turnover

RTO:

I have not see reams of documents, best estimates, bank statements, balance sheets, etc.

What I do know is that a RTO is an inexpensive way to take a company public on the targeted exchange as opposed to an IPO. If the Chinese people can find a way to do something cheaply, they will exploit it to the MAX. Remember, China is a nation of savers. It is their nature to be as tight as possible with their money. This move is commendable.

DongFang Trading company:

In China, when goods are imported or exported, the government requires the use of an Import/Export license. This license is not cheap. Some of them can cost as much as $350,000USD or more and they are specialized and specific as to what they can be used for. Large companies Like Intel, Motorola, and other western companies the US investor would be familiar with more that likely have their own import/export license they purchased from the government at a hefty fee to import raw material and export finished goods. Smaller companies that don’t have the resources to buy a license have to use other means to export. Enter the trading company. A trading company is in every sense of the word the ultimate middle man. It is not unlike acceptance banking from the days prior to wire transfer. In the case of ONP, DongFang is owned by the chairman. It appears to have been originally set up as a Trading company to import and export paper and paper related products as provided by the license. Most smaller non public companies would list a trading company as a supplier because they would pay the trading company(not the actual supplier) for the imported goods purchased. The trading company in turn then pays the supplier and normally pays any taxes due to the government, and takes a small fee for the transaction. That is how a trading company makes money from a transaction. ONP looks to be using DongFang more as an export/import license instead of a trading company and (addressing the Beijing subsidiary) still doing some actual trading with third party companies. I am not sure of the legalities of using the Im/Ex license like this but it appears to be going on. If ONP is using Dongfang as a Im/Ex license then DongFang would indeed show no or very little revenue and the cost would be reflected on the ONP books. It would be a cleaner way to account for Im/Ex transactions that way. So yes, DongFang is a shell ,but it is a required and legitimate entity.

Overstating the cost of new equipment:

Lumber, Pulp Processing, and Paper making equipment cannot be purchased at the local Walmart. Having grown up in the Northwest I am intimately familiar with this equipment. When a company wants to install a new line, be it for lumber or paper, it has to be designed to the specifications of the purchaser. When the Muddy Waters folks called the vendor for the new ONP paper line they got someone on the phone that said the biggest line they sell is much smaller than the ONP line as far as tonnage goes and it costs less. So it stands to reason that a larger line would cost more. A growing company like ONP does not have identical multiple locations through out China. Hence they do not have a stock design for a specific paper line that produces a certain tonnage annually. So that means it has to be designed and built from the ground up. A paper line that produces over 300,000 tons of paper a year is not a tinkertoy and knowing what I know about the level of technology in China, it is more than likely the biggest paper line that the vendor has ever built. The pictures that I have seen of ONP competitors show equipment that appears to have been designed, built, and imported from abroad. Imported equipment is very expensive compared to domestic built, so here again the least expensive route is taken.

Changing top 10 customers year to year.

I remember reading part of an interview with the ONP mgmt. and they stated they were going to switch a line from a high grade paper to a lower grade paper because the raw materials for the higher grade product were increasing rapidly and the margins were being reduced. After the switch, questions were raised as to how the new customers for the lower grade paper were cultivated so rapidly. The answer is that being tight with the money on the expense side, it gives ONP a big competitive edge as far as pricing. Like I have already mentioned price is the big “decider” for Chinese buyers. Unless told otherwise the cheapest always prevails.

High inventory turnover

An up and coming company like ONP with expanding orders will have a tough time keeping an inventory at all. As orders come in, production capacity is filled to the point of full capacity. At some point more equipment is ordered but before it can be installed demand keeps increasing to the point of exceeding 100% capacity. When this situation occurs, product is literally going from the machine and then loaded on the truck for delivery without intervening warehousing. I suppose that for accounting purposes some form of inventory could be recorded, but it is not a true reflection of the situation. There are some manufacturing terms I have not heard used by anyone when capacity and inventory were referred to and that is: Lean manufacturing and Just in Time. To my knowledge, ONP is not either ISO or AS certified but it doesn’t preclude the company from using modern manufacturing techniques to achieve maximum efficiency. Therefore, a minimal inventory would show a higher turnover that a slower growth company keeping a larger inventory.

Some important things to remember about China.

China is not America. Chinese businesses operate differently than American businesses. Sometimes the only common thread is profit. Only time will tell whether or not ONP is a fraudulent company. I intend to visit them in August to determine just that. My gut feeling is that they are on the up and up for the most part. Some corners may have cut here and there. The Chinese are famous for that. I think there are actions the company took that are misconstrued by some people as fraud but in the context of the Chinese business environment it is standard practice. China is a very dynamic place right now. That is why it is attracting so many investors. In a lot of cases there are no standards or average performances. As China tries to become less dependant on exports and more of a domestic consumer driven economy standards and norms will increasingly move in a state of flux along with that will come shortages, surpluses, and all the growing pains that every industrialized nation has had to endure. I view Chinese companies as no more corrupt than their American counterpart. How many off balance sheet monkey business shenanigans have US companied been caught doing in the last few years. In every country there are honest people and there are cheats. Time has a way of weeding out the bad apples.

[At the time of publication, Jackson had a long position in ONP.]

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, July 08, 2010

Update on Orient Paper

By Eric Jackson
RealMoney Contributor

7/8/2010 3:15 PM EDT
Click here for more stories by Eric Jackson


I wanted to provide an update on the further research and due diligence I've been doing intoOrient Paper (ONP - commentary - Trade Now) over the last week.

Three weeks ago, few investors had heard of this stock. On some trading days, ONP traded only 20,000 shares.

Yet, last week, a newly created website for a company called Muddy Waters published its first-ever report, suggesting that ONP was a fraud. Last Thursday, the stock lost 38% of its value in the first hour of trading. A couple of readers sent me emails describing how their brokers sold all ONP stock on Thursday, because they were purchased on margin. This accelerated the rapid price drop.

However, on Friday, 6 million shares were traded and the stock gained over 50% after a number of articles (including one by Rick Pearson and one by me, both published on TheStreet) questioning the validity of Muddy Waters' claims.

On Tuesday morning this week, ONP released a comprehensive press release, rebutting the vast majority of Muddy Waters' allegations. The response was far-reaching and detailed. Since then, Muddy Waters' website(the company published its last comment on Tuesday, ahead of the ONP release), which had been giving daily updates since it first lobbed its accusations against ONP, has been silent.

I, along with several colleagues in China, have been heavily researching ONP and the Muddy Waters allegations since they first broke last week. Although we were surprised and found that the original allegations did not jibe with our prior research on the company (which is why I bought ONP several months ago and have discussed openly why I like the company), we wouldn't be responsible investors if we didn't thoroughly examine all criticisms leveled at any of our long investments. In China especially, most Western investors have deep-seated fears of fraud going on at their expense. Even though we questioned the credibility of the people making the claims, we had to treat the allegations seriously.

ONP's new corrugating line at Qinyang No. 1
Source: Ironfire Capital

Another view of ONP's new corrugating line
Source: Ironfire Capital

....

[*** This post is an excerpt of the full article, available by clicking here to go to RealMoney.com. Note: subscription required. ***]

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, July 02, 2010

Orient Paper Visit Satisfies Investor

By Eric Jackson


07/02/10

Stock quotes in this article: ONP , FUQI

In March, I traveled with my colleagues to the headquarters of Orient Paper as part of due diligence trip on several Chinese-based, U.S.-listed companies. Coming back from the trip, and after doing more research, I invested in Orient Paper and I wrote several favorable articles on the company, articulating the case for why I thought it was under-valued.

Earlier this week, a new "research" company called Muddy Waters published its first report in which it alleged that Orient Paper is a fraud and assigned a price target of less than $1. They suggested the company had misappropriated private placement funds from investors, cooked the books and prevented them from doing their studious due diligence on site. It's had a disastrous impact on thestock price of ONP. Earlier this week, before the report came out, the stock was trading at close to $9. Yesterday, at the height of panicked selling, the stock touched $4.11.

Rick Pearson (a fellow contributing writer onTheStreet) came out last night with a strong responseto the Muddy Waters report.

I wanted to provide some additional comments, as I've spoken with the CFO, Winston Yen, several times in the last week, and one of my colleagues, Chris Lau, visited Orient Paper's headquarters yesterday in China to meet the CEO, Zhenyong Liu, the CFO and other members of the management team.

CEO Zhenyong Liu
The writer (left) with CEO Zhenyong Liu (center) and my colleauge Chris Lau.

One of the first and most remarkable things Orient Paper's CFO told me about Muddy Waters is that the firm originally contacted the company last fall asking to write a positive research report about the company for a fee. Winston said they asked for hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash plus an unspecified amount of ONP stock and warrants for their services. (Editor's note: Muddy Waters, in a press release today, disputes the cash-for-coverage allegation.)

Orient Paper said it declined the offer. They don't believe they should have to pay for an analyst to write about them. Additionally, Liu has always disliked warrants because they are dilutive to shareholders.

Muddy Waters has disclosed that it has been short ONP's stock (and possibly also have owned put options) before the report came out.

Before getting into the allegations, let me say that, whenever I invest in a company, I do so with my own capital. Neither I nor any company I have ever been affiliated with has ever been paid by a company to write about them or promote them. I would never do this. When I went to ONP in March, I did so on my own dime. When I have written about the company, I have always disclosed my long position. As my articles on TheStreet since 2008 show, I write positive and negative pieces about companies.

Orient Paper
Orient Paper's new digital photography line opened in March.

........

[** This post is an excerpt of the full article, which is available on TheStreet.com by clicking here. Free Site.**]

Sphere: Related Content

Monday, June 21, 2010

You're the Yuan That I Want

By Eric Jackson
RealMoney Contributor

6/21/2010 9:00 AM EDT
Click here for more stories by Eric Jackson


I have been bullish on China for some time. News over the weekend that Beijing was going to allow the yuan to float in some manner within the next year has been very positively received by the global equity markets. It's bullish for the Chinese economy, and global equities, but it's also very good news for Chinese equities. Here's why.

Although the United States has been bellyaching about the yuan's peg to the dollar for a long time, I actually expected no change in Chinese policy. After all, put yourself in China's shoes: Keeping the yuan tied to the dollar was continuing to support the growth of Chinese exporters globally. The Chinese government remembers well how quickly export demand dropped after Lehman Brothers failed. As a result, many factories went from running full tilt in China to laying off workers and lying dormant. Bustling barges in the Yangtze and Pearl Rivers, with incoming raw materials and outgoing exports, suddenly stopped.

It's because of this drying up of global demand that Beijing was forced to pump a $600 billion stimulus package into the Chinese economy to get the wheels turning to keep GDP ticking over at the pace it needs to support its growth and unemployment targets. Along with the stimulus, the Chinese government mandated the country's banks to push forward lending. It also accelerated a push to transition the overall economy from an export-driven one to a domestic- or consumer-driven one.

China is still dependent on exports and will remain so for several years to come. However, you would have to view its efforts to shift the country's economic emphasis so far as successful. It got the economy rolling again and, when foreign Cassandras started complaining there was a property bubble in the works, it preemptively pricked that bubble -- in about a month. All the most recent data out of the major Chinese cities suggest real estate has cooled, yet growth continues and inflation is tame.

....

[*** This post is an excerpt of the full article, available by clicking here to go to RealMoney.com. Note: subscription required. ***]

Sphere: Related Content

Friday, May 14, 2010

China (Still) Rising

By Eric Jackson
RealMoney Contributor

5/14/2010 7:32 AM EDT
Click here for more stories by Eric Jackson


Despite all the worries about a China bubble, many of its U.S.-listed companies are posting real profits and boasting tremendous potential for growth.

Next week, I'll be attending a conference in New York put on by CCG Investor Relations featuring up-and-coming U.S.-listed Chinese companies.Oppenheimer & Co. is also running a China conference next week. As many in the media took notice of the fact that Shanghai's stock market entered "bear" territory early this week, it's important to revisit the outlook for these Chinese names.

First, let's talk about the Shanghai market, perhaps the most unusual in the world. You can't short stocks or trade futures (although the Chinese government has recently proposed changing this). I haven't seen any studies, but anecdotally, it is pretty clear this index has the lowest correlation with other world markets. Therefore, you have to take its movements with a grain of salt.

This year, the Shanghai Composite Index is down 17%, compared with a 5% gain for the S&P 500. Some market watchers have been worried about this being a leading indicator of a pending China crash, with the commodities that feed the country's booming demand about to fall off a cliff. In fact, my RealMoney colleague, Don Dion, wasout this morning with an article titled "Avoid China." Recall, however, that Shanghai surged 80% in 2009 vs. 27% for the S&P. This means that, since Jan. 1, 2009, Shanghai has climbed 46% vs. 32% for the S&P.

An investor also needs to keep in mind that U.S.-listed Chinese stocks trade in line with U.S. indexes -- not the Shanghai or Hong Kong exchanges. Why? Simply because they trade on U.S. exchanges, where the primary movers are U.S. investors. A good rule of thumb is that, if U.S. equities are rising, these China-based equities trading on the Amex, Nasdaq or OTC, are up some multiple of that. However, the same holds true in down markets. One reason is that these equities are smaller and less liquid. Sometimes, just a few retail investors dumping their holdings can drop a stock.

....

[This post is an excerpt of the full article, available by clicking here to go to RealMoney.com. Note: subscription required.]

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

High Conviction: A Well-Managed Chinese Small Cap in High Growth Mode $ONP

April 13, 2010 | about: FXI / HAO / ONP / PGJ

From SeekingAlpha.com

Eric M. Jackson, Ph.D., is Founder and Managing Member of Ironfire Capital LLC, based in Naples, FL. Ironfire is an equity long-biased and corporate governance-focused investment firm.

Jackson completed his Ph.D. in the Management Department at the Columbia University Graduate School of Business, with a specialization in Strategic Management and Corporate Governance, and holds a B.A. from McGill University. He was previously Vice President of Strategy and Business Development at VoiceGenie Technologies, a software firm now owned by Alcatel-Lucent.

Seeking Alpha recently had the opportuntity to ask Jackson about his single highest conviction holding in his fund.

For starters, would you tell us a bit about your fund and your investment approach?

I founded Ironfire in 2007. We look for undervalued companies with the potential to double or triple in value over the next few years. We pay particular attention to China-based, U.S.-listed companies that operate in large growing markets, with strong corporate governance and management.

We use proprietary analytics to identify possible investments, perform rigorous research and invest. We seek to have an ongoing and positive relationship with our investee companies. Our local presence in China, through our Hong Kong and Shenzhen offices, gives us direct access to meet with our investee companies in this important market.

What is your highest conviction stock position in your fund right now, long or short?

It is a small-cap company called Orient Paper which is ONP on the AMEX. It is one of our largest long positions.

Two weeks ago I visited Orient Paper in Baoding, China - about 2 hours southwest of Beijing. The company makes fine writing paper, corrugated paper, and digital photography paper. It was started in 1994 and now operates 6 presses at 3 shifts a day. They just started producing the digital photography paper last month and therefore you won't see this new product meaningfully contribute to the company's results until Q2.

However, what impressed us most is how well the company has performed over the last few years in its core business. It's a boring business that just keeps churning out the strong results.

Revenues increased from $40m in 2007 to $102m last year, with margins increasing from 16% to 20%. Management has already projected that 2010 will see its net income increase 50%. To do this, given historical trends, they would have to see an almost doubling of revenues to $200m. However, we don't know what management's assuming to come from the digital photography business. That's a business in which there are only 3 - 5 other Chinese players. The margins should be noticeably higher on this business too.

Take it all together and we estimate you can buy ONP today for about 2.3x its forward multiple. Throw in the fact that they just completed a private placement (which means future financings are unlikely) and we think ONP could double or triple from here before the end of 2010.

Can you talk a bit about the industry/sector? To what extent is this an industry pick as opposed to a pure bottom-up pick?

We are bottom-pickers at heart. Obviously, the last few years suggest that anyone who ignores industry or macro trends does so at their own peril. Smaller publicly traded China-based companies are almost always in industries that are growing rapidly because of the rising purchase power of the emerging middle class. That trend benefits ONP specifically with respect to its corrugated paper business (which is a proxy for manufacturing health) and its digital photography business.

The Chinese are much crazier about taking photos than North Americans. However, they're just starting to get into digital photography and printing out their photos. All this said, if I didn't visit ONP, walk around the plants, see the three shift a day presses, see the stockpile of recycled paper waiting to be turned into product, and meet the CEO/founder, Mr. Liu, and his team, I wouldn't be as comfortable with the investment.

Can you describe Orient Paper's competitive environment?

Boading, where the company is located, in an unremarkable agricultural town. It reminded me of a smaller and more rural version of Bakersfield, CA. Its older plant is literally in the middle of a field. However, Baoding is strategically close to Beijing and Tianjin. That's important because those towns have heavy student, manufacturing, and publishing populations. ONP has strategic relationships with nearby long-term suppliers of text books and boxes which they turn into their fine paper and corrugated paper respectively.

There are also many buyers of their paper lines nearby. This gives them an edge in their traditional businesses.

With respect to their digital photography business, there are only 3 to 5 Chinese printer competitors serving a market of nearly 1.5 billion.

Can you talk about valuation? How does valuation compare to the competitors?

ONP is the only Chinese company of its kind that trades in the U.S. Therefore, it's difficult to compare it to others on an apples-to-apples basis.

On an absolute basis, the company is cheap. Its trailing P/E is 8x. Its trailing Enterprise Value to EBITDA is 6x.

However, as mentioned above, assuming the company hits its earnings numbers it's committed to for 2010 or beyond, we get to a forward P/E of 2+x.

Does the company export at all? How would they handle revaluing of the yuan if so?

I am pretty sure they only supply the Chinese market, so a Rmb revaluation would lower their year-over-year U.S. dollar comps.

Labor, power and raw materials costs are rising in the Chinese supply chain. How will the company deal with this?

They have a stable and local supply of recycled paper which they turn into their end use paper. They don't use wood pulp. Their supply contracts go out a year and then get rolled over. So far, these have been stable. They also reuse 80% of their water through a purification process.

Last year, the winter was colder than usual and so electricity costs were higher than usual, so they are open to that. If there were to be rolling blackouts due to power grid issues, they are at the mercy of that.

They are in a rural area 2 hours southwest of Beijing, so the labor is plentiful and inexpensive.

What is the current sentiment on the stock? How does your view differ from the consensus?

This is a small company, so part of the reason why this stock is so cheap is that there is no consensus. People don't know about it yet. We've seen a pattern with smaller Chinese-based companies listed in the U.S. that they can grow very quickly -- especially after raising money through a private placement to help fund growth.

Puda Coal (PUDA) raised some money in February, which took its stock down to below $5. However, the market quickly reassessed its growth and, with some good results and recent analyst coverage, the stock is now north of $11. We suspect a similar path this year for ONP.

Although many Western investors crave the yield they see coming out of smaller Chinese companies, they worry about the risk of fraud. Fuqi International (FUQI) recently stumbled with a delay in filing their 10K and their stock dropped almost 50%.

That's why we are big believers in looking at the corporate governance of a company and using our people on the ground in China to go out and meet these companies. You have to separate the real from the frauds, but it can be done.

Does the company's management play a role in your position?

Absolutely. The CEO, Mr. Liu, really impressed me. He founded this company in 1994 and has grown conservatively. They have only $10m in debt and he still owns 35% of the company. "I'm married to the company," he told me in Chinese. "I cannot leave this company without making it a success." He's someone who doesn't install marble fountains out front of the company. It's all about growing the business.

What catalysts do you see that could move the stock?

Earnings. Watch for Q1 earnings next month and Q2 earnings, which will be the first with a full quarter's worth of digital photography paper included, in August.

What could go wrong with this stock pick?

I don't see company-specific risks. I think management has a handle on all relevant issues and they'll perform. I think the big risk is a correction in the U.S. When U.S. stocks correct, these smaller cap Chinese companies can go down even more (just as they rise faster in up markets). I suspect the U.S. markets will pull back or go flat later this year. When they do, I hope we'll see the ONP numbers start to move the stock up on its own.

Thank you very much, Eric.

Disclosure: Eric Jackson's Ironfire Capital is long ONP and PUDA

Sphere: Related Content